outcome analysis

Within-outcome analysis

nma

We will provide a network meta-analysis (NMA) for each outcome, which adheres to Cochrane’s MECIR (Higgins et al. 2016) standards for reporting network meta-analyses, in particular, this entails ensuring we meet the thirty-two requirements in the extended PRISMA checklist for network meta-analysis (Hutton et al. 2015).

parameterised report

This page is a parameterised report. Each analysis, for each outcome, requires a number of standardised reporting procedures, that is, tables and visual summaries of statistical results and exploratory data analysis. This page is an automatically-generated report for the outcome producing standardised analyses for a specific outcomes.

When we get closer to publication, we may wish to do outcome-specific analyses in addition to the standardised analyses presented in the parameterised reports.

This is the automatically-generated parameterised report for the outcome: mood_depression.

structure of analysis

# need table of variables here

simulation parameters

# model parameters: subgroups, etc.
# filter model table

random effects models

cipriani-style all-in

subgroup analyses

condition [general grouping]

type [SSRI]

comparisons

pairwise

Higgins, JPT, T Lasserson, J Chandler, D Tovey, R Churchill, and others. 2016. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. Vol. 5.
Hutton, Brian, Georgia Salanti, Deborah M. Caldwell, Anna Chaimani, Christopher H. Schmid, Chris Cameron, John P.A. Ioannidis, et al. 2015. “The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations.” Annals of Internal Medicine 162 (11): 777–84. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385.

References